U.S. Citizens Petition For Special Prosecutor

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Bush Criminals' Top 10 Torture Techniques




"From insects to waterboarding: 10 'torture' techniques blessed by Bush
"

LINK
(1/1): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6111109.ece

READ
(1/13): An August 2002 memo to CIA acting general counsel John Rizzo by Jay S. Bybee of the U.S. Department of Justice approved 10 methods of torture for use on suspected terrorist Abu Zubaydah.

READ (2/13): These 10 methods of torture are the following: (l) "attention grasp"; (2) "walling"; (3) "facial hold"; (4) "facial slap (insult slap)"; (5) "cramped confinement"; (6) "wall standing"; (7) "stress positions"; (8) "sleep deprivation"; (9) "insects placed in a confinement box"; and (10) "the waterboard".

READ (3/13): The Bush Department of Justice and CIA agreed "these techniques (would) be used in some sort of escalating fashion, culminating with the waterboard, though not necessarily ending with this technique."

READ (4/13): 1. Attention grasp: "The attention grasp consists of grasping the individual with both hands, one hand on each side of the collar opening, in a controlled and quick motion. In the same motion as the grasp, the individual is drawn toward the interrogator."

READ (5/13): 2. Walling: "For walling, a flexible false wall will be constructed. The individual is placed with his heels touching the wall. The interrogator pulls the individual forward and then quickly and firmly pushes the individual into the wall. (...) During this motion, the head and neck are supported with a rolled hood or towel (and) the individual is allowed to rebound from the flexible wall."

READ (6/13): 3. Facial hold: "The facial hold is used to hold the head immobile. One open palm is placed on either side of the individual's face. The fingertips are kept well away from the individual's eyes."

READ (7/13): 4. Facial slap: "With the facial slap or insult slap, the interrogator slaps the individual's face with fingers slightly spread. The hand makes contact with the area directly between the tip of the individual's chin and the bottom of the corresponding earlobe. The interrogator invades the individual's personal space. The goal of the facial slap is not to inflict physical pain that is severe or lasting. Instead, the purpose of the facial slap is to induce shock, surprise, and/or humiliation."

NOTE
(1/1): The Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War signed in Geneva on August 12, 1949 states in Part I (General provisions), ARTICLE 3 that "In the case of armed conflict not of an international character (i.e. not between "nations" ... ) each Party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions: (1) Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed ' hors de combat ' by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria. To this end, the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons: (a) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; (b) taking of hostages; (c) outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment."

READ (8/13): 5. Cramped confinement: "Cramped confinement involves the placement of the individual in a confined space, the dimensions of which restrict the individual's movement. The confined space is usually dark. The duration of confinement varies based upon the size of the container. For the larger confined space, the individual can stand up or sit down; the smaller space is large enough for the subject to sit down. Confinement in the larger space can last up to eighteen hours; for the smaller space, confinement lasts for no more than two hours."

READ (9/13): 6. Wall standing: "Wall standing is used to induce muscle fatigue. The individual stands about four to five feet from a wall, with his feet spread approximately to shoulder width. His arms are stretched out in front of him, with his fingers resting on the wall. His fingers support all of his body weight. The individual is not permitted to move or reposition his hands or feel."

READ (10/13): 7. Stress positions: "(These) are designed to produce the physical discomfort associated with muscle fatigue. Two particular stress positions are likely to be used on Zubaydah: (1) sitting on the floor with legs extended straight out in front of him with his hands raised above his head; and (2) kneeling on the floor while leaning back at a 45 degree angle."

READ (11/13): 8. Sleep deprivation: "You have indicated that your purpose in using this technique is to reduce the individual's ability to think on his feet and, through the discomfort associated with lack of sleep to motivate him to cooperate. The effect of such sleep deprivation will generally remit after one or two nights of uninterrupted sleep. You have informed us that your research has revealed that, in rare instances, some individuals who are already predisposed to psychological problems may experience abnormal reactions to sleep deprivation. (...) You have orally informed us that you would not deprive Zubaydah of sleep for more than eleven days at a time and that you have previously kept him awake for 72 hours, from which no mental or physical harm resulted."

READ (12/13): 9. Confinement with insects: "You would like to place Zubaydah in a cramped confinement box with an insect. You have informed us that he appears to have a fear of insects. In particular, you would like to tell Zubaydah that you intend to place a stinging insect into the box with him, You would, however, place a harmless insect in the box."

READ (13/13): 10. Waterboarding: "(In) this procedure, the individual is bound securely to an inclined bench, which is approximately four feet by seven feet. The individual's feet are generally elevated. A cloth is placed over the forehead and eyes. Water is then applied to the cloth in a controlled manner. As this is done, the cloth is lowered until it covers both the nose and mouth. Once the cloth is saturated and completely covers the mouth and nose, air flow is slightly restricted for 20 to 40 seconds due to the presence of the cloth. This causes an increase in carbon dioxide level in the individual's blood. This increase in the carbon dioxide level stimulates increased effort to breathe. This effort plus the cloth produces the perception of suffocation and incipient panic, i.e., the perception of drowning. The individual does not breathe any water into his lungs. During those 20 to 40 seconds, water is continuously applied from a height of twelve to twenty-four inches. After this period, the cloth is lifted, and the individual is allowed to breathe unimpeded for three or four full breaths. The sensation of drowning is immediately relieved by the removal of the cloth. The procedure may then be repeated. (...) You have orally informed us that this procedure triggers an automatic physiological sensation of drowning that the individual cannot control even though he may be aware that he is in fact not drowning."

LINK (1/1): http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6111109.ece

POINT (1/1): Thousands of Americans are in jail for violating drug laws. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, et al., belong in jail for violating the Geneva Conventions, the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the Constitution of the United States (Article VI; Amendment VIII; etc.).

Colin Powell's "Number One" Denounces Torture

Too Much, Even For Some War Criminals

POINT (1/2): The authorization of forced nudity, beatings, drownings and psychological terrorism (e.g. exploiting detainees' insectophobia) are bound to cost George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, et al., their freedom. All these war criminals belong in prison.

POINT (2/2): Richard Armitage is a war criminal for having sold the American war of aggression against Iraq. He betrayed the identity of a secret governmental official whose husband had attacked his (i.e. the Bush) administration's justification for invading Iraq. He has recently denounced waterboarding as a form of torture.

READ (1/7): "In 1998, (Richard) Armitage signed "The Project for the New American Century" letter (PNAC Letter) to President Bill Clinton (urging) the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power in Iraq (because it) might develop weapons of mass destruction."

READ (2/7): "During the 2000 Presidential election campaign, he (Armitage) served as a foreign policy advisor to George W. Bush (and the) United States Senate confirmed him as Deputy Secretary of State on March 23, 2001 (...)."

READ (3/7): "A close associate of Secretary of State Colin Powell, Armitage was regarded, along with Powell, as a moderate within the presidential administration of George W. Bush. (...) Armitage tendered his resignation on November 16, 2004, the day after Powell announced his resignation as Secretary of State."

READ (4/7): "On May 10, 2006, he was elected to the board of directors of the ConocoPhillips oil company."

READ (5/7): On September 7, 2006, "Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard L. Armitage said (...) he was the initial source (...) that disclosed the CIA's previously secret employment of Valerie Plame, the wife of a prominent critic of the U.S. war in Iraq."

WATCH (1/1): "Richard Armitage Denounces Torture"

Note (1/2): Cenk Uygur explains why: (a) "looking forward" does not mean ignoring war crimes; (b) "remedial" consequences begin with punitive ones; and, (c) recognizing how the United States Congress failed to provide proper "oversight" bears on neither the Bush administration's crimes (e.g. torture) nor the necessity of redressing them through severe legal prosecutions, convictions and sentences.

Note (2/2): Cenk Uygur considers it rational to be "generous" with former Bush administration officials (i.e. "he's one of the good guys") at the "expense" of other antagonists (e.g. Dick Cheney), when the actual "good guys" fought Armitage's propaganda meant to sell aggressive war, the supreme international crime, under which "subservient" war crimes, including torture, took place (e.g. Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse).

LINK (1/1): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Snpjg4J_2X0

READ
(6/7): Former Bush Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (2001-2005) Douglas J. Feith relates a State Department policy paper (“The Future of Iraq”) was distributed by Richard Armitage at the "Deputies Lunch" on July 25, 2002, several months before the March 2003 invasion of Iraq ("Shock and Awe").

READ (7/7): "The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war 'essentially an evil thing... to initiate a war of aggression...is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.'"[1]


Torture Details Released

"Just Following Orders"

READ (1/4): "The Nuremberg Defense is a legal defense that essentially states that the defendant was 'only following orders' ('Befehl ist Befehl', literally 'order is order') and is therefore not responsible for his crimes. The defense was most famously employed during the Nuremberg Trials, after which it is named."

READ (2/4): "Before the end of World War II, the Allies suspected such a defense might be employed, and issued the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), which specifically stated that this was not a valid defense against charges of war crimes."

READ (3/4): "Thus, under Nuremberg Principle IV, 'defense of superior orders' is not a defense for war crimes, although it might influence a sentencing authority to lessen the penalty."

READ (4/4): "The United States military adjusted the Uniform Code of Military Justice after World War II. They included a rule nullifying this defense, essentially stating that American military personnel are allowed to refuse unlawful orders."

WATCH (1/1): "Torture Details Released"

Cenk Uygur discusses the difficult issue of American-sanctioned torture and his "generosity" towards the torturers, at the "expense" of their superiors, including George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, et al. - whose prosecutions are legally required in any event - is forgivable pending due correction: there is no risk in training all soldiers to both recognize and refuse illegal orders, such as committing a war crime (e.g. torture).


LINK (1/1): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wu4ZPdrRrsg